Abstract

Under clinical situations, the intervals between material mixing and light exposure during bracket bonding using light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement may vary for each individual bracket. This study evaluates the bond strength of light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement subjected to various time intervals between material mixing and subsequent light exposure. This investigation was conducted in two parts. The first part consisted of measuring the enamel surface temperature to define the conditions under which the second part of the study was carried out. One hundred fifteen subjects, 63 males and 52 females, participated in this study. The over-all mean temperature as measured with a noncontact infrared thermometer was 31.9°C. The second part of this study assessed tensile and shear bond strengths of light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement subjected to immediate light exposure (time interval, 5 minutes) and bond strengths subjected to light exposure at 10, 20, and 40 minutes after material mixing. Light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement was then compared with light-cured composite resin. Mean tensile and shear bond strengths of light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement exposed after 40 minutes were 4.5 MPa and 20.5 MPa, respectively. This represented a reduction of approximately 20% when compared with the 5-minute group. Scheffé test showed no statistically significant differences between any two time intervals. Mean bond strengths of the light-cured resin decreased with time. Tensile and shear bond strengths of light-cured resin indicated high statistical significance within groups across time. It could therefore be concluded that the bond strength of light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement was not affected by the timing of visible light exposure; whereas, the bond strength of light-cured resin decreased as time intervals increased. Light-cured resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement may thus serve as an advantageous alternative to composite resin for bracket bonding. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:139-45)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.