Abstract
Objectives: Although spinal fusion is one of the most commonly used procedures in spinal surgery its properties are not fully known. The role of decortication is still not clear. In this animal model, we investigated the effect of decortication on spinal fusion. Methods: The study included 30 male guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Spine exposure was obtained through the right subperiosteal dissection between L2 and L6 in all animals, whereas the left sides were used as controls. The animals were assigned to three groups including decortication and autografting (group 1), decortication, instrumentation, and autografting (group 2), and instrumentation and autografting without decortication (group 3). All animals were sacrificed in the sixth postoperative week. The fusion mass was assessed by means of macroscopic evaluation, manual stress test, radiologic examination, and microscopic evaluation. Results: Based on segmentary evaluations, fusion was obtained in 80%, 95%, and 92.5% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The results were found statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test, p<0.001). Conclusion: The results show that decortication should be an essential step for spinal fusion if spinal instrumentation is not considered. However, in case of a stable instrumentation, decortication seems to exert no positive effect on the formation of spinal fusion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.