Abstract

This study delves into consumers’ privacy valuation, modeling the privacy calculus as a mediating construct and aiming to investigate the factors that possibly influence the perceived costs and benefits thereof. A reverse auction was conducted within a real-life experimental field setting, which enabled the researchers to control the consumer decision-making process for customer-perceived value. The results highly support the conceptualization of the cost–benefit calculus as a mediating construct. The findings indicate that consumers distinguish between the positive and negative consequences of personalization when they determine the value of their data. Furthermore, the findings prove the important relationship between customer-perceived value and consumers’ data valuation. The findings show that negative elasticity of the suggested bid amounts to a change in usage intensity. This study substantially enhances the academic understanding of consumers’ decision-making processes when exchanging data for benefits.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.