Abstract

Learning physics for senior high school (SMA) students is often coloured by misconceptions that hinder students in achieving deep understanding. So a relevant learning model is needed. This study aims to examine the effect of conceptual change model (CCM) compared with direct instruction model (DIM) on the students’ conceptual understanding and character in the subject area of motion and force. This quasi-experimental research using a non-equivalence pre-test post-test control groups design. The population is 20 classes (738 students) of grade X consisted of 8 classes (272 students) of SMA 1 Amlapura, 8 classes (256 students) of SMA 2 Amlapura, and 6 classes (210 students) of SMA 1 Manggis in Karangasem regency in Bali. The random assignment technique is used to assign 6 classes (202 students, or 26.5% of the population). In each school there are set 2 classes each as a CCM group and DIM groups. The data of students’ conceptual understanding is collected by tests, while the characters by questionnaires. To analyse the data a one way MANCOVA statistics was used. The result of the analysis showed that there was a significant difference of effect between CCM group and DIM group on the students’ conceptual understanding and character. The effect of the CCM group is higher than the DIM group on the students’ conceptual understanding and character in learning subject area of motion and force.

Highlights

  • High school students enter the classroom do not bring an empty head, but they always bring some ideas

  • The results show that for dependent variables (DVs) of students 'understanding, F = 0.368 with sig = 0.545 > 0,05, and DV of students' character, F = 0.004 with sig = 0.950 > 0,05

  • From the source of the influence of the model on the DV of students 'understanding found the statistical value F = 8.659 with the significance number 0.004

Read more

Summary

Introduction

High school students enter the classroom do not bring an empty head (blank mind), but they always bring some ideas. The student ideas commonly in the form of an existing knowledge. Existing knowledge quality is often not scientific, but tend to be unscientific or misconception [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Misconceptions caused by improper packaging rote learning that is more about learning [6]. Rote learning closes opportunities for students to develop good character in learning physics [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call