Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the ultrasonic tip associated with mechanized instrumentation in reducing the percentage of non-instrumented surfaces of human teeth with oval or flattened root canals. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Pubmed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for literature published till October 2022. Only in vitrostudies were included, which compared conventional mechanized endodontic treatment alone against conventional endodontic treatment in association with ultrasonic tips, evaluating the reduction in the percentage of non-instrumented walls (computed microtomography). Four studies were eligible for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The majority of the studies scored low for risk of bias. The meta-analysis comparing protocols demonstrated a reduced percentage of non-instrumented walls in groups using ultrasonic tips after the conventional mechanized technique (p<0.01) with a confidence interval of 1.04 (95%CI: 0.59, 1.50). The ultrasonic tip associated with mechanized instrumentation demonstrates a significant reduction in the percentage of non-instrumented surfaces in oval or flattened canals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call