Abstract
Spinal computed tomograms and myelograms of 107 patients with sciatica or low back pain were interpreted with and without knowledge of clinical history. A significant number of interpretations was changed by knowledge of the clinical history. More studies were interpreted correctly without the clinical history than with it. Knowledge of the clinical history increased the number of false-positive and decreased the number of false-negative diagnoses. This study suggests a tendency of observers to interpret questionable myelographic or computed tomographic findings as positive when they correlate with clinical findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
