Abstract

Aim: Based on consensus rankings from prominent rating authorities, we examined the importance of a suite of climatic variables, organized by winegrape phenological stage, in distinguishing between high- and low-ranked vintages in Burgundy.Methods and Results: Vintage ratings of Burgundy wines acquired from 12 sources were evaluated to develop consensus rankings for red and white wines from 1961–2015. Climate variables (air temperature, precipitation, degree-day accumulations, etc.) were organized by mean phenological stage and compared between good and poor vintages using Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate stepwise discriminant function analysis. High temperatures, particularly during the growing season, were found to be the most consistently important climatic factor in distinguishing good-quality vintages from poor-quality vintages. The best red vintages had a greater diurnal temperature range during the growing season, whereas the top white vintages were not distinguished by unusually warm conditions, but the bottom-ranked white vintages were particularly cool and wet. The impact of rainfall varied across the growing season, with top-ranked Burgundy wines benefitting from rainfall during the bud break period and dry conditions during the ripening phase.Conclusions: The most important climatic factor in distinguishing between top- and bottom-ranked vintages is growing season temperature, especially high diurnal temperature range (for reds) and high average maximum temperatures (for whites). Good Burgundy vintages are more likely when there is ample rainfall during the bud break period in April and dry conditions during the véraison and ripening phases.Significance and Impact of the Study: As viticulturalists adapt to regional climate trends, a better understanding of how specific climate variables affect wine quality becomes increasingly important in viticulture management.

Highlights

  • There is general knowledge of the weather and climate conditions associated with good vintages and high-quality wines—adequate precipitation and warmth to grow the vine and ripen the fruit, with few if any weather extremes or the conditions that lead to disease—comprehensive analyses of the overall effects are limited (Jones, 2014)

  • The average growing season temperature for the Dijon station was 15.6°C which classifies it as a cool climate maturity region for viticulture (Jones et al, 2005)

  • Many of the climate variables examined in this study demonstrate statistically significant differences between top- and bottomranked vintages, but because many of these variables are highly correlated with each other, they represent similar climatic conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is general knowledge of the weather and climate conditions associated with good vintages and high-quality wines—adequate precipitation and warmth to grow the vine and ripen the fruit, with few if any weather extremes (like frost, hail, and heat waves) or the conditions that lead to disease—comprehensive analyses of the overall effects are limited (Jones, 2014). The most often used wine quality metrics are price and vintage ratings. It would appear that price is an efficient predictor of quality; price reflects age, rarity, and the reputation of the producer. As another surrogate for quality, vintage ratings are published by internationally recognized critics, magazines, or organizations, and compare and contrast wines from different properties, different regions, or different vintages. Jones & Storchmann (2001) found that wine market prices are sensitive to vintage ratings and Schamel & Anderson (2003) determined that regional reputations in New Zealand and Australia have a significant effect on the price premium paid by consumers Ratings and prices have been linked. Jones & Storchmann (2001) found that wine market prices are sensitive to vintage ratings and Schamel & Anderson (2003) determined that regional reputations in New Zealand and Australia have a significant effect on the price premium paid by consumers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call