The effect of care at NCI comprehensive cancer centers on disparities in outcome in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer.

Abstract

217 Background: AYAs (15-39y at diagnosis) with cancer have not seen the survival improvement evidenced by younger and older age groups with similar diagnoses, leaving an AYA Gap. While treatment on pediatric protocols is associated with superior survival in 15-21y, impact of site of care on survival for vulnerable AYA subpopulations (race/ethnicity) between 22-39y at diagnosis remains unstudied. Methods: Utilizing a cohort of 10,602 AYAs newly diagnosed between 22-39y with lymphoma, leukemia, brain tumors, melanoma, thyroid and GU cancers, and reported to the Los Angeles County cancer registry between 1998 and 2008, we aimed to determine the impact of receiving care at NCI Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCICCC) on overall survival for AYAs, and disparities in survival by race/ethnicity. We further aimed to understand the role of SES and insurance status in accessing care at NCICCC. Multivariable analyses included race/ethnicity, age at diagnosis, SES, insurance status, primary cancer diagnosis and diagnosis year in the model. Results: A total of 904 (9%) patients received treatment at the 3 NCICCC (City of Hope, Jonsson Cancer Center, and Norris Cancer Center) in LA County. Ten-year overall survival (10y OS) was significantly worse for patients treated at non-NCICCC (81%) when compared with those treated at NCICCC (83%, p=0.02). Also, 10y OS was worse for African Americans (AA) (68%) vs. non-Hispanic whites (86%, p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis adjusting for SES, insurance status, diagnosis and diagnosis year revealed that AA (HR=1.5, p=0.0001) were at an increased risk of death. Among patients treated at NCICCC, the difference in risk of death due to race (HR=0.9, p=0.84) was abrogated. However, among patients treated at non-NCICCC, these differences in outcome persisted (HR=1.48, p<0.0001). Independent of SES, insurance and tumor factors, AA (OR=0.44, p<0.001) were less likely to use NCICCC. Conclusions: Population-based data reveal that receipt of care at an NCICCC abrogates the inferior outcome observed among AA with cancer. AA are less likely to use NCICCC for treatment. Barriers to accessing care at NCICCC are currently being explored.