Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to investigate the effect of generic strategy on R&D spending and the impact of R&D spending on firms’ performance conditional on their strategic position. This empirical study uses accounting data of 597 listed Taiwanese firms in the manufacturing industry from 2013 to 2017. The data was obtained from Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database. The results indicate that firms that adopt a differentiation strategy have more R&D spending than companies with a cost leadership strategy. Furthermore, the authors find that R&D spending positively affects firms’ performance if they pursue a differentiation strategy. Meanwhile, the relationship between R&D spending and firm performance forms an inverted U-shape for those who adopt a cost leadership strategy. First, for firms adopting the differentiation strategy, the investment in R&D is critical because the more investment on R&D these firms spend, the better performance they will gain. Second, for firms with a cost-leadership strategy, R&D spending is also essential to improve efficiency. However, they should allocate the budgets wisely and reasonably, as controlling cost is the main focus of this strategy to keep their competitive advantages. This study examines the relationship between R&D spending, business strategy, and firm performance in Taiwan. Further, the study suggests that manufacturing firms in Taiwan allocate their resources wisely and efficiently according to their system.

Highlights

  • Technology development is a critical factor that drives industry upgrades and economic growth

  • For firms that adopt a cost leadership strategy, efficient research and development (R&D) spending can lead to the best performance

  • The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between R&D spending and firm performance conditional on corporate strategic positions, which is known as the internal generic strategy, with the evidence from manufacturing firms in Taiwan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Technology development is a critical factor that drives industry upgrades and economic growth. R&D expenditure positively relates to return volatility [5], and Shi [6] argues that risk from R&D activities dominates their benefits. When it comes to different firms’ characteristics, the argument of optimal level of R&D spending becomes even more complicated [4]. Instead of focusing on external objective conditions, in this paper, we would like to examine the relationship between R&D spending and firm performance conditional on corporate strategic positions, known as the internal generic strategy. Strategic positions followed Porter [7]’s generic strategies: differentiation, cost leadership, and focus. While many research papers concentrate on finding the relationship between R&D spending and firm performance from the external perspective, few papers discuss the R&D expenditure and performance of firms conditional on internal factors like generic strategies. The purpose of this paper is to fill in this research gap and examine the effect of R&D spending on firm performance under

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call