Abstract

This study sought to determine the effect of business regulation on social progress. The dependent variable, social progress, was measured in terms of social progress index of the sampled countries. On the other hand, the independent variable, business regulation, was measured in terms of business regulation score. Consequently, the study used secondary data from a sample of 248 countries over a period of five years (2014-2018). In order to determine the appropriate model for analysis, the study conducted the Hausman test where it was established that the random effect model was more appropriate as compared to the fixed effect model. Using the Stata computer program to run multiple regression analysis of the random effect model, the study findings indicated that business regulation has a positive and significant effect on social progress as given across all the six models that were estimated in this study. However, the overall effect of regulation, as given by the estimated regression coefficients under the respective models, kept varying with the introduction of an additional control variable. These findings were in accordance with the study expectations that business regulation significantly affects social progress. Further, the findings implied that, governments should devote additional resources towards addressing the social indicators of progress to meaningfully improve the living standards of residents, instead of solely focusing on economic and environmental factors. On the other hand, considering that the current study did not categorize countries according to their levels of development, it recommends for further research to determine the effect of business regulation on social progress in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries to allow for comparison of findings from countries that are at different levels of development.

Highlights

  • People’s quality of life and overall well-being indicates a nation’s welfare compared to the commonly used economic measures such as the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

  • Using the Stata computer program to run multiple regression analysis of the random effect model, the study findings indicated that business regulation has a positive and significant effect on social progress as given across all the six models that were estimated in this study

  • This study examined the effect of business regulation of social progress

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People’s quality of life and overall well-being indicates a nation’s welfare compared to the commonly used economic measures such as the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). GDP has a significant influence on people’s living standards due to its direct impact on government spending on the development of social amenities and other public resources. The measure of a country’s economic growth correlates with social progress and influences the political, legal, and social institutions with more organized countries growing faster Business organizations influence economic growth, a crucial determinant of social progress. Businesses stimulate economic growth and development and contribute to poverty alleviation through income distribution. The Social Progress Imperative report in 2015 acknowledges a relationship between a nation’s SPI score and the GDP. The world’s SPI score estimated at 62.4 in 2030 remains significantly low, and the slow rate of growth requires improved socioeconomic policies that promote people’s wellbeing and environmental preservation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call