Abstract

Bright light treatment is an effective way to influence circadian rhythms in healthy adults, but previous research with dementia patients has yielded mixed results. The present study presents a primary outcome of the DEM.LIGHT trial, a 24-week randomized controlled trial conducted at nursing homes in Bergen, Norway, investigating the effects of a bright light intervention. The intervention consisted of ceiling-mounted LED panels providing varying illuminance and correlated color temperature throughout the day, with a peak of 1000 lx, 6000 K between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Activity was recorded using actigraphs at baseline and after 8, 16, and 24 weeks. Non-parametric indicators and extended cosine models were used to investigate rest–activity rhythms, and outcomes were analyzed with multi-level regression models. Sixty-one patients with severe dementia (median MMSE = 4) were included. After 16 weeks, the acrophase was advanced from baseline in the intervention group compared to the control group (B = −1.02, 95%; CI = −2.00, −0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups on any other rest–activity measures. When comparing parametric and non-parametric indicators of rest–activity rhythms, 25 out of 35 comparisons were significantly correlated. The present results indicate that ambient bright light treatment did not improve rest–activity rhythms for people with dementia.

Highlights

  • Dysregulation of circadian rhythms, including the rest–activity rhythm (RAR), is common in people with dementia

  • Misalignment of circadian rhythms has been linked to a number of processes that may increase the risk of negative health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, cancer, and psychiatric conditions including mood disorders and psychosis [6,7]

  • We present a primary outcome from the DEM.LIGHT trial; a 24-week cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of ceiling-mounted bright light therapy (BLT) for nursing home patients with dementia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dysregulation of circadian rhythms, including the rest–activity rhythm (RAR), is common in people with dementia. The day–night difference in activity is often severely diminished, and the RAR pattern over time is typically characterized by a high degree of irregularity and fragmentation [2]. This coincides with disordered sleep and behaviors such as nocturnal restlessness and daytime inactivity that can impact the care needs and daytime functioning of people with dementia [3]. Age-related changes, such as decreased circadian rhythm amplitude (day–night difference), loss of rhythmicity, poor entrainment to the solar day, and internal desynchronization, have been observed for physiological processes, including hormone regulation, core body temperature, and RAR [8]. Our hypothesis was that the RAR would improve in the group receiving BLT compared to the control group

Materials and Methods
Participants
Sample Size and Power Calculation
Delivery of the Intervention
Group Allocation and Blinding
Light Measurements
Other Measurements
Data Management and Statistical Analyses
Ethical Considerations
Sample Descriptive Statistics
Rest–Activity Rhythms
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call