Abstract

Internal branding relatively new constructs in marketing literature. It is assumes adequate internal branding practices could enhance overall brand performance through employees’ brand consistent behavior. This study conceptualized employees’ brand consistent behavior as brand citizenship behavior. The main objective of this study is to examine the relationship between transactional and transformational brand leadership and brand citizenship behavior. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 286 respondents from 3-5 star rating hotels from northern states of Malaysia namely; Perlis, Kedah and Penang. The findings revealed that transactional and transformational brand leadership have a significant positive relationship on brand citizenship behavior. However, transformational brand leadership is more dominant in explaining brand citizenship behavior. Future research should focus on other internal branding practices as well as a new context mainly to enhance the superiority of the concept.

Highlights

  • Internal branding recognized the important roles of employees as brand sustainable competitive advantage

  • This study revealed that brand leadership is paramount important for employees to display brand citizenship behavior

  • Transactional brand leadership plays a small function in explaining the effect of overall brand leadership on brand citizenship behavior as compared to transformational brand leadership

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Internal branding recognized the important roles of employees as brand sustainable competitive advantage. In relation to internal branding, employees’ behavior towards the organization’s brand considered as critical success factor of overall brand performance. Employees’ brand behavior could be either in-role or extra role brand behavior (Burmann & Zeplin, 2005; Morhart, Herzog, & Tomczak, 2009). Burmann and Zeplin (2005) term the extra-role brand behavior as brand citizenship behavior (BCB). Brand citizenship behavior is defined as “the employees’ voluntary basis to project a number of generic employee behaviors that enhance the brand identity” The researchers essentially outlined the employees’ brand-consistent behavior that could be a part of ‘living the brand’ as proposed by Ind (2001)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.