Abstract

A comparative study was conducted to evaluate the effects of audit committee and directorates on the performance characteristics of selected companies in Jordan. The approach of panel data was adopted between 2015 to 2019 (4 years), with listed samples of 140 non-financial industries under the ASE. These firms stand for about 60% of listed firms in Jordan. Considering the audit committee and directorates effects of board characteristics on company’s performance, a total number of seven (7) variables of directorates and that of auditing committee were identified: an independent board of director, meetings of the board, size of the board, structure of the leadership, size of auditing committee, independent auditing committee together with proficiency of audit committee. The performance characteristics of companies were evaluated by means of (ROA) measure of accounting based performance. It was indicated from the results that, the following variables (independent board of directors, expert in auditing committee positively had impact on the performance ability of the selected firms. It was also revealed that, independent auditing committee together with board size of smaller capacity could enhance the performance potential of the firms. In addition to this, No significant difference was revealed on the performance of firms in term of frequency of board meetings and structure of leadership. The present research however adds more contribution to the literature on how the nature of directorate board and auditing committee could affect performance of a company in Jordan and other developing nations. However, information of great important value could assist academicians, policy makers alongside with concern stakeholders.

Highlights

  • The Corporate governance (CG) deals with many settings of governance and it are seen to be an important asset in many area of study

  • When considering the variables of board of directors (BoDs), the mean value of independent board was 0.37 which was compiled from the recommendations of JCGC signifying that, at least 1/3 of the board members were independent

  • According to Alwshah (2009), the average board‟s size was estimated to be 8.06 members with a at least 3 but 13 as highest for all samples, and this fact is in supports of the studies conducted by Idris (2012) and from work of Zedan and Abu Nassar ( 2014) in Jordan

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Corporate governance (CG) deals with many settings of governance and it are seen to be an important asset in many area of study. With the aim to maximize the wealth of shareholders, the CG can be used to regulate the corporation as mentioned by Akbar (2015) and Emile et al (2014). A good CG has the potential to foster cogent information to shareholders of firms, managers plus other beneficiary agencies with the main target of improving the overall performance of the firms (Duztas, 2008). The board of directors (BoDs) was known to be among the most important key tools of CG and safeguarding of structural governance between their firms and shareholders (Liu and Fong, 2010; Arora, 2015). CG is focused more in the mechanism actions of board of directors BoDs in line with its tasks, structures, activities, relationships and mechanism action (Arora, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call