Abstract

BackgroundFor trauma patients, delays to assessment, resuscitation, and definitive care affect outcomes. We studied the effects of resuscitation area occupancy and trauma team size on trauma team resuscitation speed in an observational study at a tertiary academic institution in Singapore.MethodsFrom January 2014 to January 2015, resuscitation videos of trauma team activated patients with an Injury Severity Score of 9 or more were extracted for review within 14 days by independent reviewers. Exclusion criteria were patients dead on arrival, inter-hospital transfers, and up-triaged patients. Data captured included manpower availability (trauma team size and resuscitation area occupancy), assessment (airway, breathing, circulation, logroll), interventions (vascular access, imaging), and process-of-care time intervals (time to assessment/intervention/adjuncts, time to imaging, and total time in the emergency department). Clinical data were obtained by chart review and from the trauma registry.ResultsVideos of 70 patients were reviewed over a 13-month period. The median time spent in the emergency department was 154.9 minutes (IQR 130.7–207.5) and the median resuscitation team size was 7, with larger team sizes correlating with faster process-of-care time intervals: time to airway assessment (p = 0.08) and time to disposition (p = 0.04). The mean resuscitation area occupancy rate (RAOR) was 1.89±2.49, and the RAOR was positively correlated with time spent in the emergency department (p = 0.009).ConclusionOur results suggest that adequate staffing for trauma teams and resuscitation room occupancy are correlated with faster trauma resuscitation and reduced time spent in the emergency department.

Highlights

  • Improvements in hospital trauma systems can lead to better outcomes and survival [1]

  • The median time spent in the emergency department was 154.9 minutes (IQR 130.7–207.5) and the median resuscitation team size was 7, with larger team sizes correlating with faster process-of-care time intervals: time to airway assessment (p = 0.08) and time to disposition (p = 0.04)

  • The mean resuscitation area occupancy rate (RAOR) was 1.89±2.49, and the RAOR was positively correlated with time spent in the emergency department (p = 0.009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Improvements in hospital trauma systems can lead to better outcomes and survival [1]. One approach to improving trauma resuscitation outcomes and standards is the auditing of team dynamics [4] [5] as well as other aspects of the hospital trauma system [6]. Alavi-Moghaddam utilized computer modelling and queuing theory analysis to unmask bottlenecks in laboratory and ED consultant capacity [7]. Once these were circumvented, significant improvements in patient flow were observed. We sought to identify barriers to time-efficient resuscitation in a tertiary academic medical center in Singapore equipped with round-the-clock emergency medicine specialist coverage and stay-in general surgery and orthopedic teams (at least senior resident level) [9], with the goal of subsequent improvement to trauma workflow.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call