Abstract
Eight general aviation pilots participated in a series of unusual attitude recovery tasks to determine the effect of the addition of audio symbology to visual symbology on performance. Two audio symbology sets were tested including a non-localized set of recovery commands, and a set of localized “fly-to” cues. Results showed that there was no significant difference in performance among the visual only condition, the visual plus non-localized audio commands, and the visual plus localized cues. There were, however, significant differences in performance based on the initial climb/dive angle condition of the unusual attitudes.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Paper Title
Journal
Date
