Abstract
The performance of three antistrip additives—a lime-treated aggregate, an amine-treated asphalt and a styrene-butadiene rubber-treated aggregate, was studied with an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Samples were prepared with the untreated asphalt and aggregate, the treated asphalt with untreated aggregate and untreated asphalt with each treated aggregate. The same asphalt and aggregate sources were used in each test and all samples were run in duplicate. All samples were examined along the asphalt-aggregate interface in the ESEM prior to and following each freeze-thaw cycle. The samples were subjected to a total of ten freeze-thaw cycles. All three additives reduced the potential for moisture damage by maintaining asphalt-aggregate adhesion better than the control samples. Based on ESEM observation of the asphalt-aggregate interface before and after freeze-thaw cycling, the styrene-butadiene rubber-coated aggregate samples performed better than the amine-treated asphalt samples which performed better than the lime-treated aggregate samples.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
