The effect of an exertional field-test on sport concussion assessment tool 5 subcomponents in University rugby and wrestling athletes: A pilot prospective case series

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate how an exertional field-test impacts the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 (SCAT5) subcomponents in uninjured athletes. DesignProspective case-series. SettingSports medicine setting. ParticipantsA total of 37 rugby and wrestling athletes (76% female) with a median age of 19 years (range: 18–23). Twenty-one (57%) had a history of concussion. Main outcome measuresThe SCAT5 was administered prior-to and following a volitionally fatiguing, field-based 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test. The primary outcome measures included: total symptom scores and severity, standardized assessment of concussion, neurological screening, and balance errors during the modified balance error scoring system. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests examined differences in ordinal data between pre- and post-exertion with Bonferroni corrections (alpha = 0.006). Data were also stratified into time to SCAT5 administration post-exertion and compared via Cliff's Delta (d). ResultsThe SCAT5 was administered a median of 20-min (interquartile range: 14-26-min) following exertion. No differences were found pre- and post-exertion across all SCAT5 metrics (p > 0.048). Within the post-exertion 0-10-min stratification, total symptoms and severity scores appeared to be elevated with a large effect size (d ≥ 0.64). ConclusionsWhile SCAT5 metrics were not statistically altered when quantified a median of 20-min following high-intensity exertion; greater symptom reporting may occur 10-min following exertion.