Abstract

The antigenicity of alum-precipitated pyridine (APPR) and aqueous ragweed (ARE) extracts was evaluated in comparable groups of animals totaling 400. A single subcutaneous dose of 0.01, 0.10, 1.00, 10.00, 30.00, 50.00, or 100.00 μg of protein N, was injected. Intradermal tests with ARE were performed 5 to 136 days later. Gross and microscopic observations were made at 20 minutes, 4, 24, and 48 hours. The negative skin reactions at 20 minutes showed that neither APPR nor ARE, in the dosage levels used, caused immediate, that is, wheal and flare type of hyperscnsitivity, at least when dye was not injected concurrently. Neither APPR nor ARE induced delayed hypersensitivity, as evidenced by negative 24 and 48 hour intradermal tests on the immunized animals, irrespective of day tested or test dose used. Only the 4 hour, typically Arthus reactions, grossly and microscopica ly were positive in either APPR or ARE immunized animals. These results indicate that alum-precipitated pyridine ragweed extract is capable of producing a much greater immunological response. Reactions were induced earlier and were maximal in many more animals immunized with minimal single doses of APPR than with those receiving equivalent doese of ARE. Furthermore, this response persisted longer.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.