Abstract

Simple SummaryLiveweight and body condition score (BCS)) are related, indicating that it may be possible to predict one from the other. The magnitude of this relationship can be altered by animal and environmental factors. The aim of the present study was to determine the nature of the association between liveweight and BCS over time, and the effect of the interaction between the stage of the annual cycle and the age of the ewe, using individual animal records. The association between liveweight and BCS was found to be linear and was affected by the interaction between ewe age, stage of the annual cycle and pregnancy-rank of the ewe. The results highlight the substantial contribution of BCS to the differences in liveweight of the ewe. The findings suggest that when predicting BCS from the liveweight, consideration of these factors is required, and different prediction equations are needed.This study determined the nature of the relationship between liveweight and body condition score (BCS) and assessed the influence of the stage of the annual cycle and pregnancy-rank on the relationship between liveweight and BCS in Romney ewes. Data were collected from the same ewes at different ages (8–18, 19–30, 31–42, 43–54, 55–66 and ≥67 months), stages of the annual cycle (pre-breeding, at pregnancy diagnosis, pre-lambing and weaning) and pregnancy-rank (non-pregnant, single or twin). Linear regression was determined as being sufficient to accurately describe the relationship between liveweight and BCS. Across all data, a one-unit change in BCS was associated with 6.2 ± 0.05 kg liveweight, however, this differed by stage of the cycle, pregnancy-rank and ewe age (p <0.05). The average liveweight per unit change in body condition score increased with the age of the ewe and was greatest at weaning and lowest pre-lambing. Among pregnancy-ranks, the average liveweight per unit change was also greater during pregnancy diagnosis than pre-lambing and was greatest among single and lowest in non-pregnant ewes. The results support the hypothesis that the relationship between liveweight and BCS is affected by the interaction between stage of the annual cycle, pregnancy-rank and ewe age.

Highlights

  • Body condition score (BCS) is a subjective measure which provides an estimate of an animal’s soft tissue reserves and is used widely by farmers and researchers to determine the Animals 2020, 10, 784; doi:10.3390/ani10050784 www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsAnimals 2020, 10, 784 physiological state of an animal [1,2]

  • By adjusting for age and stage of the annual cycle, these results suggest that 6% to 45% of the variability in liveweight was explained by differences in body condition score (BCS) and vice versa

  • The current study demonstrated that in a large population of ewes across a full range of BCS, liveweight and BCS were linearly related, and the relationship depended on the age of ewe, stage of the annual cycle and pregnancy-rank, supporting our hypothesis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Body condition score (BCS) is a subjective measure which provides an estimate of an animal’s soft tissue reserves (predominantly fat) and is used widely by farmers and researchers to determine the Animals 2020, 10, 784; doi:10.3390/ani10050784 www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsAnimals 2020, 10, 784 physiological state of an animal [1,2]. Body condition score (BCS) is a subjective measure which provides an estimate of an animal’s soft tissue reserves (predominantly fat) and is used widely by farmers and researchers to determine the Animals 2020, 10, 784; doi:10.3390/ani10050784 www.mdpi.com/journal/animals. Body condition score can circumvent the shortcomings of liveweight (LW), which include the effect of gut fill, frame size, fleece weight and physiological state [4,5,6]. Body condition score can be learned and is cost-effective and requires no specialized equipment [4]. Body condition score is considered a useful way for farmers to monitor the condition of their flock and to estimate the required plane of nutritional allowance [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call