Abstract

This study investigated the use of three types of adjunct questions to enhance and assess student learning of molecular-level chemistry concepts. Subjects were 98 volunteers in a college–level general chemistry course. The subjects were divided into three groups, each of which completed the same multimedia computer lessons, but different types of adjunct questions: (a) text-based macroscopic/symbolic questions, (b) text-based questions emphasizing the particulate nature of matter, and (c) pictorial questions emphasizing the particulate nature of matter. A conceptual test was administered, consisting of three parts: (1) macroscopic/symbolic text-based items, (2) molecular-level text-based items, and (3) molecular-level pictorial items. No significant differences were found among the three groups on any part of the test using scores on the TOLT (an assessment of formal reasoning ability), FIT (an assessment of mental capacity), and a pre-test as covariates. There was a significant positive relationship between TOLT scores and each of the three parts of the test. There was also a significant positive relationship between FIT scores and scores on the macroscopic and pictorial parts of the test. Formal reasoning ability accounted for more variance among test scores for all three parts of the test than did mental capacity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.