Abstract

Placing a machine footing over a small thickness of soil layer, which is located over a bedrock, could encounter many challenges due to the bed’s notable stiffness in comparison to the soil. The advantages of using rubbers to protect facilities (structures, machine foundations, nearby footings and equipment, etc.) from vibration and control its consequences are well known nowadays. In this study, the benefits of employing a small thickness of rubber sheet (2 mm) on the dynamic response of a machine foundation which is located over four thicknesses of soil (210, 420, 630, and 840 mm) has been investigated. The soil layer is located over an artificial bedrock that is consisted of a thick concrete layer. The tests have been conducted in a vast test pit of size 2500×2500 mm and a depth of 840 mm by using a semi large-scale machine foundation model with a square concrete foundation of width 400×400×100 mm. It was observed that, by increasing the soil layer thickness, the resonant frequency and amplitude of the vibrating system decreases. Moreover, by employing a rubber sheet beneath the machine footing, the resonant frequency of the vibrating system significantly decreases especially for a small thickness of the soil layer. Although, using a rubber sheet could slightly increase the resonant amplitude, but the benefit of the resonant frequency-changing capability of the rubber sheet is too impressive by taking the resonant frequency of the system far enough from the unchangeable working frequency of the machine and preventing the resonant phenomenon to happen.

Highlights

  • Machines have been used for centuries to ease the life of humans

  • It shows that the resonant frequency of the FMRT over a rubber sheet is less than a case of no rubber sheet

  • It was observed that the resonant frequency and equivalent dynamic shear modulus of the system with a rubber sheet are smaller than the system without a rubber sheet and the vertical resonant amplitude and equivalent total damping ratio of the system with a rubber sheet is slightly larger than the system without a rubber sheet

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machines have been used for centuries to ease the life of humans. As these machineries become more advanced, the generated vibration turned into an engineering problem, and protecting the machine’s bed and any facilities nearby became vital. A similar observation has been made by Ramesh and Prathap Kumar [22] They found the thickness about 2.5 times the foundation width. As the rubber has much smaller stiffness in comparison to the soil and considering its notable damping properties, it could be an ideal material to be used as a method to improve the dynamic response of machine foundations. The benefits of employing a rubber sheet (as it is simple to be used in comparison to other methods such as sand rubber particles mixture) to improve the dynamic response of a machine foundation which is located over a limited thickness of soil over an artificial bedrock, have been investigated. The “me.e” is the total eccentricity mass and is the angular frequency

Test Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call