Abstract
This paper studied how firms on China's key pollution supervisory list (KPSL) disclose environmental information in corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports according to legitimacy theory. Using a sample of A-shares listed Chinese firms from 2012 to 2019, it is shown that firms on KPSL utilize longer text and more tables and figures in their environmental information disclosure (EID), but adopt less positive textual tone to describe environmental performance. Besides, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-state-owned enterprises (NSOEs) have different presentation styles. These styles for EID do not contribute to firm performance, especially adopting less positive textual tone negatively influences firm reputation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.