Abstract
Sound-field Bekesy audiograms were obtained from one experienced hearing-impaired subject wearing an ear-level hearing aid with a conventional earmold and a nonoccluding CROS-type earmold. Comparisons were made to determine the effects of the two different types of earmolds as well as different tubing lengths for nonoccluding CROS-type earmolds. Findings indicate: (1) A nonoccluding CROS-type earmold alters the frequency response characteristics of a hearing aid by markedly reducing the amplification for the low frequencies. (2) The length of tubing has a minor effect compared with that caused by the nonoccluding CROS ear coupler. (3) Sound-field Bekesy audiometry is a reliable and valid tool for assessing changes in the amplifying characteristics of hearing aids.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
