Abstract

Objectives To investigate the bond strength between cpTi and low fusing porcelains after different treatments. Methods 72 patterns were covered with a ceramic coating and invested with phosphate-bonded material (group A), another 72 were invested with magnesia material (group B) and all cast with cpTi. 31 solid castings were selected from each group. The castings of group B were ground and sandblasted, while the castings of group A were only sandblasted. Aluminum content of the metal surface was determined by EDS and castings were submitted to a 3-point bending test to determine the modulus of elasticity ( E). The porcelains Duceratin Plus, Noritake Ti22 and Triceram were applied respectively and specimens were submitted to a 3-point bending test. The fracture mode and the remaining porcelain were determined by optical microscopy and SEM/EDS. Bond strength and fracture mode were calculated by two-way ANOVA. Results The E of groups A and B was 98.3 GPa and 98.6 GPa respectively. The bond strength was 26 ± 3 MPa (Duceratin Plus), 28 ± 3 MPa (Noritake Ti22), 27 ± 2 MPa (Triceram) for group A and 24 ± 1 MPa, 29 ± 2 MPa, 27 ± 1 MPa for group B respectively. No significant differences were found for the same porcelain between the two groups ( p < 0.05). A significant difference was found between Duceratin Plus and Noritake Ti22, for group B ( p < 0.05). The mode of failure was mainly adhesive for all specimens. A significant reduction in aluminum was recorded in all subgroups. Significance The special coating of patterns makes the Ti casting procedure inexpensive, without reducing the metal–ceramic bond strength.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call