Abstract

Jon Parmenter seeks to explain Iroquois territorial expansion and the wars it often engendered in the period leading up to 1701. The Iroquois, readers learn, were not motivated by a desire to control the fur trade—so that putative goal cannot account for Iroquois wars and geographic expansion. Rather, they fought various native and European powers as part of a “mourning war” cycle of hostilities and to maintain control over their lands. Iroquois “spatial mobility” (a rarely defined phrase but usually meaning travel, relocation, or war against others in lands not adjacent to Iroquois villages) “represented the geographic expression of Iroquois social, political, and economic priorities,” and much of it was reflected in the “Wood’s Edge” ceremony (p. xii). Iroquois ability to expand Iroquoia, to travel across it, and to control “information conduits” and access to their land helped them endure the onslaughts brought by new diseases and by others who warred against them (ibid.). It was a deliberative adaptive strategy—not a reflection of a disintegrating and faction-ridden culture.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.