Abstract
This paper treats of the most economical width of top of the commonly-accepted type of section of solid, gravity, non-overflow dams. The writer believes it to be the general opinion of engineers that the section with a zero top width, namely, a triangular section, contains the minimum area consistent with fixed assumptions; and, that the adoption of a definite width of top for a roadway or other purpose is made at a sacrifice of economy. Presumably, for this reason, many dams have been built with tops as narrow as 5% of the height. This investigation, however, shows, that the most economical width of top, for usual designing assumptions, is not zero, but lies generally between 10 and 17% of the height, according to the assumptions used in the design. As the difference in the volumes of sections, having quite a wide range of top widths, is very small compared with the uncertainty of many of the designing assumptions, the writer feels that many of his readers may consider this paper of academic rather than of economic interest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.