Abstract

Although a disease of low mortality, the global impact of foot and mouth disease (FMD) is colossal due to the huge numbers of animals affected. This impact can be separated into two components: (1) direct losses due to reduced production and changes in herd structure; and (2) indirect losses caused by costs of FMD control, poor access to markets and limited use of improved production technologies. This paper estimates that annual impact of FMD in terms of visible production losses and vaccination in endemic regions alone amount to between US$6.5 and 21 billion. In addition, outbreaks in FMD free countries and zones cause losses of >US$1.5 billion a year.FMD impacts are not the same throughout the world:1.FMD production losses have a big impact on the world's poorest where more people are directly dependent on livestock. FMD reduces herd fertility leading to less efficient herd structures and discourages the use of FMD susceptible, high productivity breeds. Overall the direct losses limit livestock productivity affecting food security.2.In countries with ongoing control programmes, FMD control and management creates large costs. These control programmes are often difficult to discontinue due to risks of new FMD incursion.3.The presence, or even threat, of FMD prevents access to lucrative international markets.4.In FMD free countries outbreaks occur periodically and the costs involved in regaining free status have been enormous.FMD is highly contagious and the actions of one farmer affect the risk of FMD occurring on other holdings; thus sizeable externalities are generated. Control therefore requires coordination within and between countries. These externalities imply that FMD control produces a significant amount of public goods, justifying the need for national and international public investment.Equipping poor countries with the tools needed to control FMD will involve the long term development of state veterinary services that in turn will deliver wider benefits to a nation including the control of other livestock diseases.

Highlights

  • Foot and mouth disease (FMD) has been eradicated by many wealthy nations but remains endemic in most of the world

  • Knowledge of disease impact is essential when deciding on the level of expenditure that can be justified by a disease control programme

  • The objective of this paper is to describe the economic impact of FMD including how it varies in different settings and how knowledge of this should be used to guide control policy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) has been eradicated by many wealthy nations but remains endemic in most of the world (see Fig. 1). When considering the burden of a disease one must step back and consider its impact at the population level To consider this as a function of losses in diseased individuals and the number affected is an over-simplification; for livestock diseases and FMD in particular the full impact of a disease is far more complex. The objective of this paper is to describe the economic impact of FMD including how it varies in different settings and how knowledge of this should be used to guide control policy. This included a synthesis of current literature. To help appreciate the scale of global FMD impact estimates were made of the direct costs of disease and vaccination in endemic countries as well as outbreak costs in free countries

Methods
Categorised impacts of FMD
Visible losses
Invisible losses
Additional costs
Revenue foregone
FMD control
Economic analyses of FMD and its control
The magnitude of global impact – endemic regions
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.