Abstract

In this paper we present results for educational achievement in the different economic regions of Latin America (Big countries: Mexico and Brazil; Southern Cone; Andean countries; Central America; and others) during the twentieth century. The variables we use to measure education are average years of education, literacy, average years in primary school, average years in secondary school, and average years in university. To attain a broader perspective on the relationship of education with human capital and with welfare and wellbeing we relate the educational measures to life expectancy and other human capital variables and GDP per capita. We then use regressions to examine the impact of race and ethnicity on education, and of education on economic growth and levels of GDP per capita.The most significant results we wish to emphasize are related to the importance of race and racial fractionalization in explaining regional differences in educational achievement. Southern Cone countries, with a higher density of white population, present the highest levels of education in average terms, while countries from Central America and Brazil, with a higher proportion of Indigenous Americans and/or blacks, have the lowest levels. In most countries the major improvements in educational achievement are: the expansion of primary education during the first half of the twentieth century, and the expansion of secondary education after 1950. In all cases, average years in university are low, despite improvements in university quality during the last decades of the century when professors exiled during dictatorships returned to their countries of origin. International comparisons (continental averages for years of education weighted by country population size) place twentieth-century Latin America in an intermediate position between the USA and Europe at the top, and countries from Asia and Africa at the bottom.

Highlights

  • Research into human capital shows a general consensus that its formation has been unequal among individuals and groups, within and across countries

  • An historical example of this second causal relation in Latin American countries was the spread of mass education during the “Estado Docente” years that fostered economic growth in the “Desarrollismo” period (Frankema 2009, Abad 2016)

  • In the figures and tables in the appendix we present the data on the evolution of human capital variables, in terms of both education and health, in Latin American countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research into human capital shows a general consensus that its formation has been unequal among individuals and groups, within and across countries This fact has had further consequences for patterns of economic performance. We must consider that how much education individuals receive does not strictly depend only on personal choice, at least in developing countries They are subject to constraints such as income level, parental income, urban or rural residence, and gender (Balcazar, Narayan, Tiwari 2015). Inequality in human capital formation has varied among Latin American nations and regions and could be an important factor influencing economic growth. The recent literature suggest that it is only after certain levels of health and education are achieved that the impact of human capital accumulation on economic development becomes important

Data Sources and Methodology
The Role of Race and Ethnicity in Educational Attainment
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.