Abstract

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is preferentially found on fermenting fruits. The yeasts that dominate the microbial communities of these substrates are the primary food source for developing D. melanogaster larvae, and adult flies manifest a strong olfactory system-mediated attraction for the volatile compounds produced by these yeasts during fermentation. Although most work on this interaction has focused on the standard laboratory yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a wide variety of other yeasts naturally ferment fallen fruit. Here we address the open question of whether D. melanogaster preferentially associates with distinct yeasts in different, closely-related environments. We characterized the spatial and temporal dynamics of Drosophila-associated fungi in Northern California wineries that use organic grapes and natural fermentation using high-throughput, short-amplicon sequencing. We found that there is nonrandom structure in the fungal communities that are vectored by flies both between and within vineyards. Within wineries, the fungal communities associated with flies in cellars, fermentation tanks, and pomace piles are distinguished by varying abundances of a small number of yeast species. To investigate the origins of this structure, we assayed Drosophila attraction to, oviposition on, larval development in, and longevity when consuming the yeasts that distinguish vineyard microhabitats from each other. We found that wild fly lines did not respond differentially to the yeast species that distinguish winery habitats in habitat specific manner. Instead, this subset of yeast shares traits that make them attractive to and ensure their close association with Drosophila.

Highlights

  • All animals interact with microbes, and it is increasingly clear that the collection of microbes with which an animal interacts can have a dramatic impact on its physiology, behavior, and other phenotypes [1,2,3,4,5]

  • In our initial harvest season, we collected in two wineries, one in Healdsburg, CA (HLD1) and the other in the Santa Cruz Mountains (SCM)

  • We found that all yeast species on the yeast panel were suitable for Drosophila melanogaster development, with the exception of CellarA on Pichia kluyveri

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All animals interact with microbes, and it is increasingly clear that the collection of microbes with which an animal interacts can have a dramatic impact on its physiology, behavior, and other phenotypes [1,2,3,4,5]. Some of the microbes associated with animals in the wild are highly specific and acquired through dedicated mechanisms that ensure the robust maintenance of their interaction [6,7,8]. Other associations are more contingent, and involve microbes acquired as the animal navigates a microbe rich environment. While this latter class has received less attention, studying the contingent microbiome of wild animals can reveal important details of natural history, ecology, and behavior.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call