Abstract

Design for Values (DfV) philosophies are a series of design approaches that aim to incorporate human values into the early phases of technological design to direct innovation into beneficial outcomes. The difficulty and necessity of directing advantageous futures for transformative technologies through the application and adoption of value-based design approaches are apparent. However, questions of whose values to design are of critical importance. DfV philosophies typically aim to enrol the stakeholders who may be affected by the emergence of such a technology. However, regardless of which design approach is adopted, all enrolled stakeholders are human ones who propose human values. Contemporary scholarship on metahumanisms, particularly those on posthumanism, have decentred the human from its traditionally privileged position among other forms of life. Arguments that the humanist position is not (and has never been) tenable are persuasive. As such, scholarship has begun to provide a more encompassing ontology for the investigation of nonhuman values. Given the potentially transformative nature of future technologies as relates to the earth and its many assemblages, it is clear that the value investigations of these design approaches fail to account for all relevant stakeholders (i.e., nonhuman animals). This paper has two primary objectives: (1) to argue for the cogency of a posthuman ethics in the design of technologies; and (2) to describe how existing DfV approaches can begin to envision principled and methodological ways of incorporating non-human values into design. To do this, the paper provides a rudimentary outline of what constitutes DfV approaches. It then takes up a unique design approach called Value Sensitive Design (VSD) as an illustrative example. Out of all the other DfV frameworks, VSD most clearly illustrates a principled approach to the integration of values in design.

Highlights

  • Many of the events, interactions, and processes that humans engage in are carried out by means of technological artefacts

  • This paper argues that an extension of what constitutes stakeholders in Design for Values (DfV) approaches is required—not as a second-order consideration for humans, but for those stakeholders per se

  • Designing for values has made a dramatic impact on the motivations behind technological artefacts and how those artefacts implicate values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interactions, and processes that humans engage in are carried out by means of technological artefacts. Prior literature on DfV, and VSD in particular, has emphasised the structure of the approach itself [12,13] along with how these methodologies can be applied to both current innovations [14,15,16] and speculative future innovations [17,18,19] This literature provides useful information for understanding DfV approaches and how they can function, it remains thoroughly anthropocentric in its value investigations. This means it fails to account for necessarily broader implications, enrolments, and enmeshments for nonhuman agents.

Technological Assessment and Designing for Values
Value Sensitive Design
Empirical Investigations
Technical Investigations
Bridging a Severing of Praxis
Posthumanism and Reclaiming Animality
Metamorphosis
Metaphysics
Materialism
A Companion Ethics
Designing Anticipation
Designing Technofutures
Constructing a Hybrid Project
Attuning to Representation
Limitations and Future
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.