Abstract

The Ecological Footprint is an accounting tool that has been used by resource managers and widely communicated to the public over the last 20 years. The National Footprint Accounts (NFA) are a system of national-level Ecological Footprint accounts that can be geographically scaled to derive Footprint values for major consumption categories at the household level for a given region, province, city or urban agglomeration. A number of city Footprint assessments have been undertaken during the last two decades. However, these studies have used different approaches, rendering comparability challenging. Here we present a top-down approach to consistently track the Ecological Footprint of 19 coastal cities in the Mediterranean region. Valletta, Athens, and Genoa are the cities with the highest per capita Ecological Footprint, ranging between 5.3 and 4.8 gha per person; Tirana, Alexandria and Antalya have the lowest Ecological Footprint, ranging between 2.1 and 2.7 gha per capita. Most cities’ Footprints exceed that of their countries with the exception of Thessaloniki, Tel Aviv, Venice, Palermo and Naples. This analysis provides a macro-level indication of the overall resource demands by cities, their drivers and leverage point. The main Footprint drivers are food consumption, transportation and consumption of manufactured goods. Differences among cities’ Ecological Footprint values are most likely driven by socio-economic factors, such as disposable income, infrastructure, and cultural habits. City level Footprint findings can be used to help design sustainability policies and positively reinforce collective public achievements so far.

Highlights

  • Decision makers currently face the challenge of navigating through a wealth of disparate information

  • The Ecological Footprint embedded in trade flows as well as the indirect resource requirements throughout the supply chain were calculated by means of Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) modeling (Ewing et al, 2012; Weinzettel et al, 2014) and used to derive the national Ecological Footprint of consumption

  • The top-down (MRIO-based) Ecological Footprint approach presented in this paper allowed consistently comparing the resources requirements of 19 cities in the Mediterranean region

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision makers currently face the challenge of navigating through a wealth of disparate information. The main contribution of this accounting tool is in providing a benchmark to compare the demand humans place on the ecosystems and in its applicability at scales ranging from single products to the world as a whole (Kitzes et al, 2009). This in turn allows users to understand resource demand at local scales while gaining insights on how it relates back to the global sustainability challenge

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call