Abstract
In their frequently cited book Eastman and Stykolt (1967) advanced two major propositions concerning the effect of small market sizes on Canadian industry. Specifically they predicted that in tariff protected markets in which domestic consumption is small relative to the minimum efficient scale of plant one would discover both an abnormally high fraction of output produced in plants of suboptimal scale and an abnormally high percentage of foreign ownership. These hypotheses have become deeply ingrained in the discussion of Canadian industrial economics.1 In most cases they are accepted as a basis for policy discussion without further investigation. This paper assesses the theoretical and empirical support for the first EastmanSykolt proposition, that small market size induces suboptimal capacity. On the basis of an extensive literature search2 it concludes that there is considerable empirical support for some aspects of the theory but that the theory itself has not been satisfactorily formulated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.