Abstract

The Eastern Qiangtang Terrane is an orogenic-like belt around the Eastern Himalayan syntaxis (EHS). The deformation history of this terrane must be known to understand how the EHS region responded to the Lhasa-Qiangtang collision and the closure of the Bangong-Nujiang Ocean (BNO). Here, we present a new paleomagnetic investigation on an Early Cretaceous granite (∼126 Ma) in the Zaduo area, Eastern Qiangtang Terrane. Petrographic observations reflect crystallization from primary melts with only limited subsequent alteration (chloritization of biotite). Magnetite appears to be the dominant carrier of the characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) based on stepwise demagnetization of the natural remanent magnetization, supplemented by detailed rock magnetic measurements, including magnetization versus temperature, and acquisition curves of the isothermal and anhysteretic remanent magnetization. End-member modeling of those acquisition curves helped to constrain the paleomagnetic analysis. The inconsistent demagnetization behavior between alternating field (AF) demagnetization at high levels and thermal demagnetization was attributed to the development of gyroremanent magnetization in the AF demagnetization generated by fine-grained single domain magnetite. The ChRM directions from 92 granite samples in geographic coordinates yield an average of declination (Dg) of 2.6° and inclination (Ig) of 38.6° (precision parameter k = 51.4, and 95% confidence cone α95 = 2.1°). The amount of tilting of the granite is poorly constrained which makes proper correction rather tedious. We compared the expected bedding attitudes (Strikeexp = 43.1°, Dipexp = 46.1°) derived from published data (Huang et al., 1992;Tong et al., 2015) with the average observed bedding attitudes (Strikeobs = 54°, Dipobs = 32°) of the Middle-Upper Jurassic sandstones of the Yanshiping Group that was intruded by the Early Cretaceous granite. The discrepancy between the expected and measured bedding attitudes implies that the strata of the Yanshiping Group in the Zaduo area were already tilted prior to the intrusion of the ∼126 Ma Zaduo granite, which was attributed to the Lhasa-Qiangtang collision and the closure of the BNO. The collision led to a series of geological events, such as the tilting of the strata, the ophiolite emplacement, the development of a peripheral foreland basin, and the magmatic activity gap. The tilting/folding of the strata was generally delayed by the layer parallel shortening processes during the early stages of the deformation, thus suggesting an older Lhasa-Qiangtang collision (i.e., >126 Ma).

Highlights

  • The present-day Tibetan Plateau is known as the “roof” of the world and the “third pole” of the Earth

  • isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition curves (43 field steps) were measured on those samples with a maximum applied field of 700 mT. Both anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) and IRMs were measured by an in-housedeveloped robot (Mullender et al, 2016), which allowed the samples to pass through a 2G Enterprises SQUID magnetometer hosted in a magnetically shielded room at Utrecht University

  • End-member modeling was used to illustrate the mechanism of remanence acquisition and to confirm a primary natural remanent magnetization (NRM); measurement and data analysis procedures are described in Aben et al (2014), and the program used in this paper can be found online

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The present-day Tibetan Plateau is known as the “roof” of the world and the “third pole” of the Earth. The timing of the Lhasa-Qiangtang collision that followed the BNO closure, remains controversial, ranging from the Middle or Late Jurassic (Xu et al, 1985; Dewey et al, 1988; Yan et al, 2016; Ma et al, 2017; Li et al, 2019a, 2019b) to the Early Cretaceous This sheds new light on the timing of the Lhasa-Qiangtang collision, as well as the closure of the BNO

GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND SAMPLING
LABORATORY TECHNIQUES
PETROGRAPHY
Magnetization Versus Temperature
Anhysteretic Remanent Magnetization Acquisition Curves Analysis
Demagnetization
Characteristic Remanent Magnetization Directions
END-MEMBER MODELING OF MAGNETIC COMPONENTS
End-Member Modeling of Acquisition
End-Member Modeling of Acquisition Curves of ARM
Primary Natural Remanent Magnetization in the Early Cretaceous Granites
CONCLUSION
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call