Abstract

This paper reviews the stratigraphical and environmental contexts of early human occupation and lowland glaciation in Britain and northern Europe. It highlights the fragmentary nature of most of the critical sequences and the inadequacy of existing stratigraphical frameworks. The earliest archaeology known from NW Europe has been reported from Happisburgh 3, a site on the Norfolk coast. The flint artefacts from here were recovered from sediments previously assigned to the Pastonian Stage of the Early Pleistocene. However, the mammalian assemblage from Happisburgh 3 differs from other local sites attributed to the ‘Pastonian’, indicating a younger age within the Early Pleistocene. The sediments have reversed palaeomagnetic polarity and have palynological features inviting correlation with the Leerdam interglacial in the Dutch ‘Bavelian Complex’. The interglacials of the British ‘Cromerian Complex’ are compared and their archaeological record reviewed. At most of these sites, the archaeology includes hand-axes associated with a mammalian assemblage containing the water vole Arvicola but at Pakefield, Suffolk, a core-and-flake industry is associated with the ancestral Mimomys savini. This, together with the even older record from Happisburgh 3, indicates earlier periods of human occupation than previously known from NW Europe. At least five temperate episodes with distinct faunal assemblages are now recognized in the British early Middle Pleistocene but these are unlikely to equate directly with odd-numbered stages of the marine isotope record. This biostratigraphical framework conflicts with a ‘New glacial stratigraphy’ for East Anglia, which proposes glaciations during MIS 16, 12, 10 and 6. Evidence is reviewed from Sidestrand and Trimingham, where datable organic sediments occur directly beneath and above the Middle Pleistocene glacial succession, indicating that it was emplaced entirely during the Anglian glacial stage (MIS 12). A new stratigraphical framework is provided ranking British sites in order of relative age, which is then compared with a revised scheme for the Dutch late Early and early Middle Pleistocene succession. The revisions involve the relocation of the Waardenburg interglacial (‘Interglacial 1’) to the ‘Bavelian Complex’ and the use of the Brunhes-Matuyama palaeomagnetic reversal to define both the base of the Dutch ‘Cromerian Complex’ and the Early/Middle Pleistocene boundary. Moreover, following recent re-interpretation, the Noordbergum interglacial (‘Interglacial IV’) and ‘Glacial C’ are removed from the ‘Cromerian Complex’ and are correlated with MIS 11 and MIS 12 respectively. This scheme imposes greater consistency between the British and Dutch successions, as well as conformity with guidelines recommended by the International Stratigraphic Commission.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.