Abstract

Sudan has experienced decades of armed conflict marked by ethnic, regional, and political divisions. This study delves into the multifaceted dynamics of Sudan's armed conflict, focusing on the role and relevance of power-sharing agreements as a potential avenue for conflict resolution and sustainable peace. A comprehensive analysis of historical data, including conflict timelines, peace agreements, and socio-political factors, was conducted. The study reveals that Sudan's armed conflict is deeply rooted in historical grievances, economic disparities, and ethnic tensions. Power-sharing agreements have been recurrent features of peace efforts, with varying degrees of success. These agreements often aim to distribute political power among different factions, including rebel groups and the central government. While some have contributed to temporary ceasefires, the sustainability of peace remains challenging due to underlying structural issues and contentious interpretations of power-sharing provisions. The study concludes that the dynamics of Sudan's armed conflict are multifaceted and deeply entrenched, demanding a nuanced approach to peacebuilding. Power-sharing agreements offer a relevant but imperfect mechanism for conflict resolution. For lasting peace, they must be part of a broader strategy that addresses historical grievances and structural inequalities, fostering an inclusive and stable political environment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call