Abstract

Research background: Even if they share a similar background, the ex-communist European countries have started since the ‘90s to differentiate one from another in terms of development. Nowadays, the gaps between them are significant in many aspects of the socio-economic environment, including innovation. Measurements done by Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO through the Global Innovation Index give us the opportunity to compare the achievements from the last 30 years of the ex-communist countries. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to point out the major gaps between the European ex-communist countries in terms of innovation – both innovation inputs and innovation outputs – in the context of globalization, and the way the globalization fostered or suppressed the innovation. Methods: We will do a comparative analysis of the indicators that the input and output indexes are based on – regulatory environment, education, general infrastructure, credit, investment, knowledge workers, knowledge creation, knowledge impact, online creativity, intangible assets. Findings & Value added: This paper may add value to the economic and educational policies in the ex-communist countries by identifying the policies that proved their effectiveness in increasing innovation rates, policies that can be adapted and then adopted by the ex-communist countries that are less innovative.

Highlights

  • Research background: Even if they share a similar background, the excommunist European countries have started since the ‘90s to differentiate one from another in terms of development

  • Zheng et al [6] show that overall globalization only has a significantly positive influence on innovation output in the least innovative countries and that globalization leads to better innovation performance in the medium innovative countries among OECD countries

  • The current comparative analysis among the 8 EU ex-communist countries relies on Global Innovation Index (GII) raw data that can be found in the Global Innovation Index 2019, 12th edition [14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research background: Even if they share a similar background, the excommunist European countries have started since the ‘90s to differentiate one from another in terms of development. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to point out the major gaps between the European ex-communist countries in terms of innovation – both innovation inputs and innovation outputs – in the context of globalization, and the way the globalization fostered or suppressed the innovation. Economic development is based on 3 major elements, according to the exogenous growth model: a) capital accumulation – including real estate investments, equipment, and human resources; b) population growth, including labour; c) technological progress reflected in higher productivity rates [1]. According to the endogenous growth theory, the second main theory, developed by Romer [2] and Aghion and Howitt [3], technological innovation and knowledge diffusion are the key approaches under which workers’ educational achievement influences economic growth. Zheng et al [6] show that overall globalization only has a significantly positive influence on innovation output in the least innovative countries and that globalization leads to better innovation performance in the medium innovative countries among OECD countries

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call