The Dynamics of Immigrant Welfare and Labor Market Behavior

Abstract

This Paper analyzes transitions into and out of three different labor market states: social assistance, unemployment and employment. We estimate a dynamic multinomial logit model, controlling for endogenous initial conditions and unobserved heterogeneity, using a large representative Swedish panel data set, LINDA, for the years 1990-6. The unadjusted data indicates that immigrants are more likely to receive both social assistance and unemployment compensation than natives are. Immigrants are less likely to remain employed in consecutive years than natives are and are more likely to stay on and to receive unemployment insurance in any year, given participation in the previous year. The empirical results suggest that refugee immigrants display a greater degree of structural state dependence than natives. Further, immigrants from non-refugee countries display a similar degree of structural state dependence as natives. The high participation rates among refugee immigrants seem to be due to the existence of a welfare trap, while participation among natives and non-refugee immigrants is largely due to permanent unobserved characteristics. These results suggest that reforms will have differential effects on refugee immigrants and natives.