Abstract
This paper presents systematic data on downsizing and delayering trends in Australia and New Zealand. It is based on comparative survey data of 1321 private and public sector organizations. The distribution and depth of downsizing is similar in the two countries. The article compares the outcomes of downsizing in relation to key HRM variables. Our results indicate opposing trends between New Zealand and Australia: in Australia firms have suffered negative human resource outcomes following downsizing, whereas in New Zealand employee motivation and commitment have tended to increase after downsizing. Why are there such wide discrepancies between the outcomes in New Zealand and Australia? The article concludes that discrepancies arise partly because of the restructuring cycle and partly because the frequency of downsizing in Australian organizations has created a severe case of ’survivor syndrome’. These conclusions have implications for the management of downsizing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
