Abstract

We address three questions. First we ask to what degree elections to the U.S. House of Representatives may be understood to reflect the influence of current public opinion? This requires us to entertain models of House elections with incumbency effects as a dynamic system. We ask, second, how do the effects of exogenous influences of all sorts work their way into ultimate House composition? Third, we ask if some portion of the effects attributed to incumbency might not be simply these dynamics, reasserted effects of previous elections, in addition to the well-known advantages individual incumbents accrue? We estimate pooled models of state-level aggregate voting for the House. We add Policy Mood to the usual set of explanations as a means to specify the central focus of democratic theories of elections. We focus on how incumbency translates contemporaneous effects of the explanatory variables into dynamic effects and on how this translation differentially affects the various inputs to the system.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.