Abstract

The alveolar fricative occurs in word-final position in English in different grammatical functions. Nominal suffixes may indicate plurality (e.g. cars), genitive case (e.g. car’s) or plurality and genitive case in cumulation (e.g. cars’). Further, there are the third person singular verbal suffix (e.g. she fears) and the cliticized forms of the third person singular forms of have and be (e.g. she’s been lucky; she’s friendly). There is also non-affixal s (e.g. freeze (noun)). Against the standard view that all these types are homophonous, several empirical studies have shown that at least some of the fricatives listed can actually be differentiated in their duration. The present article expands this line of research and considers a further case, which has not been included in previous analyses: pluralia-tantum nouns (e.g. goggles). We report on a carefully controlled reading study in which native speakers of British English produced pluralia-tantum and comparable regular-plural nouns (e.g. toggles). The duration of the word-final fricative was measured, and it was found that the two do not systematically differ in this acoustic parameter. The new data are interpreted in comparison to relevant previous studies, and against the background of the similarities of pluralia-tantum and regular-plural nouns.

Highlights

  • The correspondence between form and meaning or function is not always one to one

  • Our goal is to expand this line of research and investigate a so far unexplored type of word-final s in English, the s of pluralia-tantum nouns (PTN), and to compare its duration to that of regular-plural nouns (RPN)

  • We present the descriptive statistics of the dataset without statistical outliers (648 data points) in Table 4 and Fig. 2.11

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The correspondence between form and meaning or function is not always one to one. One meaning or function can be represented by several forms, and several meanings or functions can be expressed by a single form. A further case in this line of research is the investigation of different types of word-final s in English. Scholars detected acoustic variation in these supposedly homophonous kinds of s (see, e.g., Seyfarth et al 2018); one category of word-final English s has so far been ignored, namely that of PTN (e.g. goggles). Given the linguistic differences between PTN and RPN (e.g. toggles) in English, it makes sense to examine how their final segment is uttered. This represents a logical extension of previous research. PTNs are interesting, since they could be either the surprise, or they might show that we have reached the end point, where the forms are homophonous

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call