Abstract
In the article Darius and His Behistun Inscription, which appeared in AJSL, LV (1938), 392 ff., Professor Olmstead on page 398 arrives at the conclusion that the Magian GaumAta, who claimed to be Bardia, son of Cyrus,' ruled not seven months but one and seven months, namely, from March 11, 522, to October 17, 521. As a consequence he places Darius' aiccession to the throne not on Teiritu 10, 522/21, but on Tesritu 10, 521/20, a dating which if proved correct would make it necessary to drop all dates given in my table for the events of the and second years of Darius' reign (AJSL, LV, 14347) by one year. Professor Olmstead bases his conclusion on the wellknown fact that a number of Babylonian tablets are dated in the second, third, and fourth months of the accession year of Barzia,2 while others are dated in the and the third to eighth months of the first year of Barzia. Since Gaumata started his rebellion in the twelfth, i.e., the last, month of the 523/22, the accession year of the Babylonian tablets, including as it does a second, a third, and a fourth month, necessarily can be referred only to the following year, 522/21; and since the accession year under ordinary circumstances undoubtedly precedes the official of a king,3 Professor Olmstead's conclusion that the official first year of Barzia represents the
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.