Abstract

BackgroundSpecies movement responses to landscape structures have been studied using a variety of methods, but movement research is still in need of simple methods that help predicting and comparing movements across structurally different landscapes. We demonstrate how habitat-specific movement models can be used to disentangle causes of differentiated movement patterns in structurally different landscapes and to predict movement patterns in altered and artificial landscapes. In our case study, we studied the role of riparian landscapes to the persistence of the endangered false heath fritillary butterfly (Melitaea diamina) in its newly discovered coastal distribution region in Finland. We compared the movement parameters of the riparian population to two reference populations by using capture-recapture data and habitat-specific diffusion modelling, and analysed the role of the river and riverbank buffer zones in facilitating or hindering false heath fritillary movement with movement simulations.ResultsThe riparian population of the false heath fritillary did not show major differences to reference populations in terms of movement parameters within breeding habitat, high-quality matrix and low-quality matrix. However, movement simulations showed that the habitat-specific movement parameters estimated for the false heath fritillary can lead into markedly different movement patterns in structurally different landscapes. An artificial riparian landscape mimicking those of the coastal distribution resulted into more directional, longitudinal movements both parallel and perpendicular to the river than a more mosaic-like landscape, but the existence of the river in the landscape reduced movements across the river.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates how habitat-specific movement models enable comparisons of movement patterns across structurally different real, altered and artificial landscapes. As such, they can be used to compare movement parameters across populations, to study the effects of management interventions to endangered species and to identify areas that have high sensitivity to individual movement. In our case study, the river is shown to perform a dual role for the movements of the riparian false heath fritillary population. Whereas the river acts as a moderate movement barrier for the false heath fritillary, the longitudinal configuration of riverbank habitats provides a means especially for the male false heath fritillaries to move across the landscape.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40462-015-0031-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Species movement responses to landscape structures have been studied using a variety of methods, but movement research is still in need of simple methods that help predicting and comparing movements across structurally different landscapes

  • In comparison to the reference populations, the riparian population shows a trend towards lower movement rate in the low-quality matrix (DLQM), higher preference for the high-quality matrix, higher female mortality (m) and higher capture probability of females (p)

  • False heath fritillary movement parameters proved similar across populations when the riparian capturerecapture data was contrasted against data simulated for the riparian landscape based on the reference movement models (Figures 3 and 4, Table 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species movement responses to landscape structures have been studied using a variety of methods, but movement research is still in need of simple methods that help predicting and comparing movements across structurally different landscapes. We compared the movement parameters of the riparian population to two reference populations by using capture-recapture data and habitat-specific diffusion modelling, and analysed the role of the river and riverbank buffer zones in facilitating or hindering false heath fritillary movement with movement simulations. Study methods have included direct observations of movement [12,16,20,21], capture-recapture methods [17], spatiotemporal patterns in species sightings during migration periods [17], densities of species sightings at riverbanks versus other habitats [13,15,18] and population genetic studies [14,19]. Relocation and mobbing call experiments have been used to study movements parallel and perpendicular to rivers in birds [29,30,31,32], demonstrating differences in species movement along rivers versus across them [33] and indicating the dual role of rivers in the formation of both movement barriers and functional movement corridors [34,35,36,37] for many terrestrial species

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call