Abstract

The observation that two theories share the same formal structure, that is, differ only in the interpretation placed on symbols, can almost always be used to simplify a body of knowledge. The purpose of this communication is to demonstrate that Cournot's theories of duopoly and complementary monopoly are formally identical; furthermore, a precise statement of the correspondence which identifies them serves to extend a famous criticism of the duopoly theory. Cournot's duopoly theory (Cournot, 1963, chap. vii) applies to a market situation in which two producers sell identical products, and his complementary monopoly theory (Cournot, 1963, chap. ix) to a market situation in which two producers sell products which are of no use unless combined in a fixed ratio (say 1:1) to form a composite commodity. Edgeworth observed that, in the former case, "there cannot well be supposed two prices; and [in the latter case] . .. there cannot be supposed two (independent variations of the) quantities" (Edgeworth, 1925, p. 122). For two producers (A and B) this suggests a formal definition of duopoly as a situation in which the sum of the producers' outputs (denoted by

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call