Abstract

Patients with symptomatic metastases referred for outpatient palliative radiotherapy for symptom control at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (rrrp) and the Bone Metastases Clinic (bmc) at the Toronto–Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre have a limited life expectancy. Relevant medical information is missing from the files of many referred patients when they arrive at the clinics, potentially causing delayed treatment and ambiguity in the best management of their needs in situations of worsening condition. Clear documentation of the do-not-resuscitate (dnr) order is imperative to avoid panic and the taking of unnecessarily aggressive measures in situations in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) has no benefit or is not desired. Here, we report the current practices of cpr code status documentation for patients referred to the rrrp and the bmc for outpatient palliative radiotherapy. We reviewed referral notes and accompanying medical records for 209 consecutive patients seen in the rrrp and the bmc during May–August 2004 for documentation of cpr-related advance directives. Patient demographics and cancer history were also recorded. Only 13 (6.2%) of the 209 patients had any documented reference to cpr code status. Of these 13 patients, 8 were dnr-coded, and 5 were full code. As compared with patients having no documented cpr code status, patients with documented status were significantly older (median age: 77 years; p = 0.0347), had poorer performance status (median Karnofsky performance status score: 40; p = 0.0001), and were more likely to be referred hospital inpatients (69%, p = 0.0004). Only a small proportion of symptomatic advanced cancer patients had any documentation of cpr code status upon referral for outpatient palliative radiotherapy. In future, our clinics plan to request information about cpr code status on our referral form.

Highlights

  • Resuscitation of patients with sudden cardiopulmonary arrest was first implemented in the 1960s 1

  • We reviewed referral notes and accompanying medical records for 209 consecutive patients seen in the Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) and the Bone Metastases Clinic (BMC) during May–August 2004 for documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)-related advance directives

  • We reviewed the referral information and medical forms for all consecutive patients seen in the RRRP and BMC clinics at Toronto–Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre (TSRCC) during May–August 2004 for documentation of CPR-related advance directives, if any

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Resuscitation of patients with sudden cardiopulmonary arrest was first implemented in the 1960s 1. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be desirable in trying to prevent sudden, unexpected death in patients whose medical condition would be expected to improve following successful CPR. CPR is rarely successful, especially in patients with advanced metastatic cancer. Since the 1970s, documentation of the do-notresuscitate (DNR) order has been in practice in situations in which CPR is thought to have no valuable role and little chance of success—especially in patients with an underlying incurable medical condition such as metastatic cancer 3–7. Life-prolonging treatment is withheld in patients when the chance of recovery or improvement from the underlying illness is thought to be very low. Despite the use of the DNR order in the thirty or so years since the emergence of CPR, many difficulties about how DNR decisions are put into practice remain, including the use of consistent and clear documentation in medical records

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.