Abstract

Examining the nature of teachers’ emotions and how they are managed and regulated in the act of teaching is crucial to assess the quality of teachers’ instruction. Despite the essential role emotions play in teachers’ lives and instruction, research on teachers’ emotions has not paid much attention on teachers’ emotions in the context of daily teaching. This paper explored elementary teachers’ emotions while preparing for teaching and during teaching mathematics, reasons that underlie these emotions, and the relationship between their emotions and the quality of their mathematics instruction. Participants were seven elementary teachers working in the U.S. who participated in Holistic Individualized Coaching (HIC) professional development that consisted of five cycles of coaching over an year. For each coaching cycle, pre-coaching conversation and post-coaching conversation data were collected regarding emotions teachers felt in anticipation of teaching and during teaching retrospectively. In order to compare teachers’ emotions with instructional quality, coaching sessions were video recorded and analyzed to determine the quality of instruction. Findings of this study showed that teachers reported six categories of emotions (positive, negative, neutral, blended-positive, blended-negative, and mixed), described emotions often in non-typical ways (e.g., “not nervous”, “anxious but in a positive way”), and experienced mixed emotions (co-occcurence of positive and negative emotions) as the most dominant emotion. Teachers also had more positive emotions anticipating teaching than actually teaching the lesson. The reason teachers felt mixed emotions reflected the complex and context-specific nature of teaching, a phenonemenon not currently described in the teacher emotion literature. There were no clear relationships between emotional experiences and instructional quality. This study allowed participants to freely describe their authentic, complex, overlapping, and ambiguous emotions in the context of active teaching, which contributes opening up the possibilities of diversifying teacher emotion research and shows the significance and usefulness of understanding teachers’ emotions related to active instruction.

Highlights

  • Emotions are an omnipresent aspect of teachers’ daily experiences (Nias, 1996; Hargreaves, 2000; Sutton and Wheatley, 2003)

  • Emotions described in the post-coaching conversations should be interpreted as retrospective accounts of emotions felt during the teaching of the lesson

  • We discussed the range of emotions teachers described in relation to teaching mathematics over five coaching cycles and any changes observed in both trait and state emotions, the underlying reasons for these emotions, and the relationship between teachers’ quality of instruction and their emotional experiences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Emotions are an omnipresent aspect of teachers’ daily experiences (Nias, 1996; Hargreaves, 2000; Sutton and Wheatley, 2003) They are not peripheral; they are integrally connected to cognition and action and as such guide the processes that inform how we make choices and act (Oatley, 1991; Hargreaves, 2000). They guide our judgment and frame what and how we reflect. Since Shulman’s (1987) work on pedagogical content knowledge, numerous researchers (e.g., Hill et al, 2008) have built on and expanded this work, yet the literature is still sparse related to understanding the emotional dimensions of teachers’ knowledge and work (Zembylas, 2007)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call