Abstract

DNAJA1 (DJA1/Hdj2) and DNAJA2 (DJA2) are the major J domain partners of human Hsp70/Hsc70 chaperones. Although they have overall similarity with the well characterized type I co-chaperones from yeast and bacteria, they are biologically distinct, and their functional mechanisms are poorly characterized. We identified DJA2-specific activities in luciferase folding and repression of human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) trafficking that depended on its expression levels in cells. Mutations in different internal domains of DJA2 abolished these effects. Using purified proteins, we addressed the mechanistic defects. A mutant lacking the region between the zinc finger motifs (DJA2-Δm2) was able to bind substrate similar to wild type but was incapable of releasing substrate during its transfer to Hsc70. The equivalent mutation in DJA1 also abolished its substrate release. A DJA2 mutant (DJA-221), which had its C-terminal dimerization region replaced by that of DJA1, was inactive but retained its ability to release substrate. The release mechanism required the J domain and ATP hydrolysis by Hsc70, although the nucleotide dependence diverged between DJA2 and DJA1. Limited proteolysis suggested further conformational differences between the two wild-type co-chaperones and the mutants. Our results demonstrate an essential role of specific DJA domains in the folding mechanism of Hsc70.

Highlights

  • DNAJA2 functions with Hsc70 to assist protein folding

  • The m2 subdomain is required for productive substrate release from DJA2, coupled to the hydrolysis of ATP by Hsc70

  • DJA1 has a similar m2-dependent release mechanism that may be coupled to a later stage in the Hsc70 ATPase reaction

Read more

Summary

Background

DNAJA2 functions with Hsc to assist protein folding. Results: An internal structure in DNAJA2, conserved in DNAJA1, is essential for folding activity and release of substrate triggered by the Hsc ATPase. Based on DnaJ and Ydj, a model of function for the type I co-chaperones has been proposed in which a DNAJ binds substrate, contacts an Hsp through its J domain, and transfers substrate to the Hsp during ATP hydrolysis while dissociating from the complex [2, 3, 15, 16]. This model is thought to apply to DJA1 and DJA2, at least in its broad outlines. Our results suggest a model of DJA2 function in which there is a coordination of the binding and release of substrate with different domains of DJA2 to promote folding

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.