Abstract

AbstractAimIsolation is a key factor in island biology. It is usually defined as the distance to the geographically nearest mainland, but many other definitions exist. We explored how testing different isolation indices affects the inference of impacts of isolation on faunal characteristics. We focused on land bridge islands and compared the relationships of many spatial and temporal (i.e., through time) isolation indices with community‐, population‐ and individual‐level characteristics (species richness, population density and body size, respectively).LocationAegean Sea islands, Greece.Time periodCurrent.TaxonMany animal taxa.MethodsWe estimated 21 isolation indices for 205 islands and recorded species richness data for 15 taxa (invertebrates and vertebrates). We obtained body size data for seven lizard species and population density data for three. We explored how well indices predict each characteristic, in each taxon, by conducting a series of ordinary least squares regressions (controlling for island area when needed) and a meta‐analysis.ResultsIsolation was significantly (and negatively) associated with species richness in 10 of 15 taxa. It was significantly (and positively) associated with body size in only one of seven species and was not associated with population density. The effect of isolation on species richness was much weaker than that of island area, regardless of the index tested. Spatial indices generally out‐performed temporal indices, and indices directly related to the mainland out‐performed those related mainly to neighbouring islands. No index was universally superior to others, including the distance to the geographically nearest mainland.Main conclusionsThe choice of index can alter our perception of the impacts of isolation on biological patterns. The nearly automatic, ubiquitous use of distance to the geographically nearest mainland misrepresents the complexity of the effects of isolation. We recommend the simultaneous testing of several indices that represent different aspects of isolation, in order to produce more constructive and thorough investigations and avoid imprecise inference.

Highlights

  • Isolation and area are the two main abiotic factors purported to affect insular evolutionary ecology and biogeography (Hamilton & Armstrong, 1965; Itescu, 2019; MacArthur & Wilson, 1967; Santos, Field, & Ricklefs, 2016; Whittaker & Fernández‐Palacios, 2006)

  • We focused on contemporary values of area and spatial iso‐ lation, because Weigelt, Steinbauer, Cabral, and Kreft (2016) showed that they were more important than past conditions for total plant species richness on islands worldwide

  • Even under the permissive threshold for statistical significance (p < .05), none of the 21 indices we tested was correlated with the population density of H. turcicus, one had a negative effect in M. kotschyi, and three had a positive ef‐ fect in P. erhardii (Table 4)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Isolation and area are the two main abiotic factors purported to affect insular evolutionary ecology and biogeography (Hamilton & Armstrong, 1965; Itescu, 2019; MacArthur & Wilson, 1967; Santos, Field, & Ricklefs, 2016; Whittaker & Fernández‐Palacios, 2006). On land bridge islands, which are often much closer to the source landmass, spatial isolation (i.e., the mini‐ mal geographical distance of a focal island from other landmasses) is expected by some to affect species richness only weakly (Case, 1975; Palmeirim, Vieira, & Peres, 2017). Diver (2008) and Weigelt and Kreft (2013) examined this for plant species richness, comparing a variety of spatial isolation indices, and found that it was not Instead, other indices, such as the amount of sur‐ rounding land area and the distance from close larger islands, per‐ formed better. As re‐ cent results imply (Matthews et al, 2019), isolation from adjacent islands would be more strongly related to faunal characteristics than isolation from the mainland

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call