Abstract

Whether early school stratification is conducive or detrimental to scholastic performance has been subject to controversial debates in educational policy and science across many countries. We exploit a unique exogenous variation in Lower Saxony, Germany, where performance based tracking was preponed from grade 7 to grade 5 in 2004, i.e. with the completion of primary school. In particular, we measure the long-run effects of this reform on PISA achievement test scores based on a difference-in-differences setup. In order to disentangle average from distributional achievement effects, we complementarily rely on a changes-in-changes framework. Our results indicate that preponed school tracking increased test scores at the upper tail of the skill distribution and lowered test scores at the lower tail of the skill distribution, compensating each other on average.

Highlights

  • While most countries teach students comprehensively in primary school, some countries track students into different tiers in secondary school

  • In coherence with the theoretical predictions, Piopiunik (2014) concludes that further tracking gave rise to lower state Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)-test scores based on a state-level difference-in-difference research design

  • We set out a simple model of human capital development involving positive spillover effects from high-skilled to low-skilled students and a penalty that punishes teaching targeted at a distant student in the skill distribution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While most countries teach students comprehensively in primary school, some countries track students into different tiers in secondary school. In coherence with the theoretical predictions, Piopiunik (2014) concludes that further tracking gave rise to lower state PISA-test scores based on a state-level difference-in-difference research design. In his framework, there might be self-selection in or out of the untreated third track which would bias the results. This study contributes to the empirical literature on early school tracking by providing causal estimates of the effect of early school tracking on the achievements of students in the context of a developed country by using micro data and exploiting a quasi-experimental setting.

Theory
Empirical Strategy
Difference-in-Difference
Changes-in-Changes
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.