Abstract
Our study examines the expression and position of subjects in L2 acquisition, two phenomena that are studied within the framework of the Interface Hypothesis (IH). The first version of the IH predicts that interface properties involving syntax and another cognitive domain may not be fully acquirable in a second language (Sorace and Filiaci, 2006; also Sorace, 2011). The second version of the IH predicts that formal properties involving the syntax-semantics interface are unproblematic to acquire in L2 grammars compared to the vulnerable properties integrating syntax with the higher level of pragmatics (Tsimpli and Sorace, 2006). We test these IH versions in L2 Spanish as acquired by L1 Greek speakers, a language combination understudied in the literature. Both languages share the null subject parameter, but still the IHs predict incomplete command at the syntax-pragmatics interface. Two acceptability judgment tasks were designed for Spanish: the first task tested null/overt subjects in referential contexts and the second task tested preverbal/postverbal subjects in informational contexts. Participants were L1 Greek intermediate and advanced learners of Spanish and native speakers of Spanish (15 subjects in each group). In the first task, both experimental groups showed target-like distribution of null/overt subjects in most non-contrastive and contrastive contexts, except for the advanced group in unambiguous referential contexts. In the second task, the respective groups accepted felicitous preverbal subjects with unergative verbs, but diverged from native-like distribution of postverbal subjects with unaccusative verbs in neutral contexts. The L2 groups showed a high preference for unfelicitous preverbal subjects with both intransitive verbs in informational contexts, contrary to the subject inversion patterns of the control group. The results obtained were not consistent with the IH predictions, and other factors such as the type of subject, verb class and context played a role in L2 performance.
Highlights
In this study, we explore the acceptance of null/overt subjects and preverbal/postverbal subjects in specific pragmatic contexts in L2 Spanish acquisition by Greek learners
After studying the anaphora resolution of null/overt subjects, Sorace and Filiaci (2006) introduced the first version of the Interface Hypothesis (IH) (IH-1 hereafter), which predicts that interface structures involving the mappings between syntax and other cognitive domains such as pragmatics are more complex to acquire in L2
We have examined the distribution of subjects in the judgments of L1 Greek intermediate and advanced learners of L2 Spanish in two contextualized acceptability tasks
Summary
We explore the acceptance of null/overt subjects and preverbal/postverbal subjects in specific pragmatic contexts in L2 Spanish acquisition by Greek learners. In their work, Sorace and Filiaci (2006) examined anaphora resolution at the syntax-pragmatics interface, concerning the use of null/overt subjects in appropriate contexts They focused on the mastery of anaphora resolution in L2 acquisition of Italian by L1 English. Tsimpli and Sorace (2006) proposed a second version of the IH (IH-2 hereafter), taking into consideration the distinction between the syntax-semantics interface, involving the formal properties of grammar and the syntax-pragmatics interface, involving a higher level of language use, integrating properties of language and pragmatic processing. Their definition of the IH is stated in (2)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.