Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms governing the coexistence of organisms is an important question in ecology, and providing potential solutions contributes to conservation science. In this study, we evaluated the contribution of several mechanisms to the coexistence of two sympatric frugivores, using western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and central chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) in a tropical rainforest of southeast Cameroon as a model system. We collected great ape fecal samples to determine and classify fruit species consumed; we conducted great ape nest surveys to evaluate seasonal patterns of habitat use; and we collected botanical data to investigate the distribution of plant species across habitat types in relation to their “consumption traits” (which indicate whether plants are preferred or fallback for either gorilla, chimpanzee, or both). We found that patterns of habitat use varied seasonally for both gorillas and chimpanzees and that gorilla and chimpanzee preferred and fallback fruits differed. Also, the distribution of plant consumption traits was influenced by habitat type and matched accordingly with the patterns of habitat use by gorillas and chimpanzees. We show that neither habitat selection nor fruit preference alone can explain the coexistence of gorillas and chimpanzees, but that considering together the distribution of plant consumption traits of fruiting woody plants across habitats as well as the pattern of fruit availability may contribute to explaining coexistence. This supports the assumptions of niche theory with dominant and subordinate species in heterogeneous landscapes, whereby a species may prefer nesting in habitats where it is less subject to competitive exclusion and where food availability is higher. To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate the contribution of plant consumption traits, seasonality, and habitat heterogeneity to enabling the coexistence of two sympatric frugivores.OPEN RESEARCH BADGES This article has earned an Open Data Badge for making publicly available the digitally‐shareable data necessary to reproduce the reported results. The data is available at https://datadryad.org/resource/doi:10.5061/dryad.ms65f29.

Highlights

  • A great challenge in ecology is understanding the evolutionary and ecological implications of biotic interactions (Sutherland et al, 2013), which has led researchers to question the mechanisms shaping the coexistence of closely related species (Benítez‐López, Viñuela, Suárez, Hervás, & García, 2014; Hutchinson, 1961; Kotler & Brown, 2007)

  • We considered five habitat types in our study, based on the physical structure of the forest, the height of the dominant trees, and the hydromorphic status of the soil: Mature Forests (MF), Young Secondary Forests (YSF), Light Gaps (LG), Swamps (SW) and Riparian Forests (RF), modified from Willie et al (2013), Willie et al (2014) (Figure A1)

  • In the analysis of all seasons pooled in the present study, we found light gaps to be significantly preferred by gorillas, and YSF to remain used proportionally to its availability (Figure A2a,b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A great challenge in ecology is understanding the evolutionary and ecological implications of biotic interactions (Sutherland et al, 2013), which has led researchers to question the mechanisms shaping the coexistence of closely related species (Benítez‐López, Viñuela, Suárez, Hervás, & García, 2014; Hutchinson, 1961; Kotler & Brown, 2007). Species may have become specialized through character displacement (e.g., morphological differentiation) by partitioning the shared resource (Walter, 1991) Such niche partitioning reduces exploitation com‐ petition (Rosenzweig, 1981), leading to a divergence of realized niches (Sinclair, Fryxell, & Caughley, 2006; Walter, 1991) and fa‐ cilitating coexistence. This implies that the sympatric species may have reached some equilibrium in the use of resources that allow them to coexist (Pianka, 1981). Spatial or temporal variations in resource availability can lead to changes in the pattern of habitat use by sympatric species (Grether, Losin, Anderson, & Okamoto, 2009; Rosenzweig, 1981)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call